Fraud
US v Macasaet Jr.
Guilty
Romy Macasaet Jr. of Homewood,
Illinois, admitted paying kickbacks for referrals to his company Howe Bound
Healthcare. He paid money to 20 medical directors as a bribe to send
patients to his place. He agreed to pay the feds $6.8 million to resolve
civil allegations but will be sentenced for the criminal actions. He also
resigned his employment with Home Bound and to divest all ownership
interest.
US v North American Health Care
Settlement
The skilled nursing home company agreed
to pay $28.5 million to settle allegations that they billed fraudulently for
rehab therapy services that were not needed. Also the board chair agreed
to personally $1 million and the senior vice president of reimbursement analysis
has agreed to pay $500,000. The company also entered into a five year CIA
as well.
US v Mahmood
Sentenced
Dr. Taiq Mahmood of Cedar Hill, Texas,
was found guilty in a jury trial of health care fraud for fudging codes in
hospitals he owned. He was sentenced but appealed and now was re-sentenced
to 135 month in federal prison and ordered to repay $145,000.
US v Midwest Family Practice
Settlement
The Warren, Michigan, physician owner
of the practice Dr. Hussein Awada agreed to pay $200,000 to settle allegations
that he wrote prescriptions for oxycodone without medical reason and billed for
the services. The allegations also say that he gave patients unnecessary
monthly x-rays to cover up his fraud. He plead guilty in a related
criminal action and was sentenced to 84 months in prison and to pay $2.3 million
in restitution. He was also ordered to forfeit assets. The civil
case was a whistleblower one where the receptionist will get $36,000.
US v Malik
Indicted
Five people have been indicted in a
scheme to defraud. The feds allege that Drs. Sandeep Sherlekar and Atif
Makik of Germantown, Maryland conspired with Muhammad Kahn, Mubtagha Syad and
Konstantin Bas to use kickbacks for the needed urine tests and DME prior to and
for pain treatment. The feds also allege the two physician lied about both
being present for epidurals so higher charges could be made.
US v Kindred Health
Fined
Kindred Health was under a CIA and did
not comply with it. They were fined just over $3 million for their lapses.
Peer Review and Employment
Telesford v Maryland Provo-i Med.
Services
D DC
A white male replaced a black male as
medical director of the ED. Later a white male was promoted to lead PA
without advertisement. The medical director said he was the most
qualified. When questioned he then said the PA was hired by a corporation
contracted to provide doctors and PAs. Then seven black PAs filed a
discrimination suit. The medical director also threatened them with firing
if they did not agree to a new fee structure and then took that back and paid
them all what they should have been paid. The court said no retaliation
since they had been paid what owed but allowed the racial discrimination suit to
go ahead. This came after a black nursing director stated that the medical
director claimed she had green lighted the PA when she had not.
Rowell v Phoebe Putney Memorial
Hospital
Ga Ct App
The female anesthesiologist had an
agreement to work on nights and weekends at the hospital via an exclusive
provider. The employer and the VPMA of the hospital met about the care by
Rowell. She was told by her employer to not come to work and if she did
she would be suspended. The employer later called Rowell and told her she
was not suspended and she needed to fight the hospital. Rowell decided to
go quietly and collected her final paycheck. The employer terminated her
med mal insurance and she was no longer qualified to be on the hospital
staff. She sued the hospital and VPMA for the usual things and to no one's
surprise lost at summary judgment.
Healthcare
Oracle v Oregon
Settlement
Oracle has agreed to pay the state $100
million to settle the cross suits over the complete foul up of the Ocare startup
several years ago. The website was a dismal failure. The settlement is
payment of $25 million to the state and and additional $75 million in software.
Oregon paid Oracle $240 million for the failed site. They then went to the
federal exchange. The original filed complaint against Oracle wanted $6
billion for racketeering and all sorts of nonsense. To date legal costs
alone are over the settled $25 million. It should be interesting in the
future how Oregon does with the Oracle software.
BCBS v Vermont
To BE Filed
The insurer says it is due $6.2 million
for premiums they did not receive and claims paid after the state cancelled
their individual insurance plans. Last year the state paid $1.2 million to
settle the same type claims. There will be a settlement prior to actually
filing a suit.
Cunningham v Colorado
Filed
In a ACLA led lawsuit Colorado has been
accused of denying treatment to him because he has government insurance.
Colorado now covers the treatment only for people whose livers have reached
stage two scarring due to hepatitis. Private insurance cover the drug
treatment regardless of how far its advanced. Colorado Medicaid says it
cannot spend that much money on one disease. The stage 2 was only started
this month. Prior it was stage 3. Also all who are drug or alcohol
abusers will need to enroll in counseling at least one month before receiving
the regime. The suit says that the withholding of the drug to any one is
illegal.
B. E. v Teeter
Filed
In the Washington state case a similar
suit as the one above has been filed. Interestingly here Gilead, the drug manufacturer
of the Hepatitis regime has donated hundreds of thousand dollars to the people
who helped bring this case. They get the money back if Medicaid pays for
the medicine. It should be noted that Gilead's rivals have also contributed
to the case.
Moran v Prime Healthcare
Ca Ct App
The patient went to a hospital ED on
three occasions as self pay, signed a financial liability contract and charged
over $10,000. Prior to getting a bill he contacted the hospital to tell
them he was uninsured and out of work and asking for relief. No
response. He then sued stating self pay are charged more than insured and
that is discrimination and against the UCL and the CLRA. The patient lost
on the discrimination and CLRA as variable pricing is allowed and he failed to
show that he relied on the a misrepresentation by the hospital that he would be
charged the same as all other patients. He won summary judgment on the UCL
claim that the financial liability contract is unconscionable. Those that
need medical care are at a disadvantage and must sign to get care and be charged
much more than the actual cost of care.
Rollins v Dignity Health
US Supreme Court
Rollins sued her employer in 2013 for
failure to comply with ERISA. She claimed that Dignity did not fully
insure and fund their pension plan. Dignity claimed they were a religious
entity and exempt for that requirement. Justice Kennedy has issued a
temporary stay from Dignity having to comply with the 9th Circuit ruling that
they are not exempt. The high court will later decide whether or not to
take up the appeal.
Nicodemus v St. Francis Memorial
Hospital
Ca Ct App
A class action suit was filed stating
that the hospital charged more for attorney medical record requests than was
allowed. The lower court refused to certify the class but the appeals
court ordered them to certify.
Malpractice
Patients v University of
Washington Medical Center
To Be Filed
Two patients have died from Legionnaire's
Disease and another is sick with it. An investigation has showed the
source of the Legionnaire's to be a ice machine and two sinks in the cardiac
unit. The bacteria was also found in devices used to heat and cool
patients during heart surgery. This was also true in the outbreaks
recently in Pennsylvania. The water in the machines do not come into
contact with the patient's blood there is a possibility of the bacteria to enter
other parts of the device or be transmitted via the air says the FDA.
Lemmons v Sonoma County
Filed
Lemmons was a homeless man jailed in
December for sleeping outside a grocery store. He was in his cell, he
states, for two days without medical treatment for pain in his feet. He
was taken to Kaiser prior to his booking and diagnosed with hypothermia. He
could not see a doctor until his first court appearance and a judge ordered
immediate treatment for his black toes and purple legs. He was sent back
to Kaiser, found to have gangrene and had his feed and part of his right leg
amputated. He does not seem to be suing Kaiser for the original diagnosis
and their cleared for custody letter.
Morales-Ramos v Hosp. Episcpal San
Lucas Guayama
D PR
Puerto Rico finally found a
hospital that was really dumb enough to get caught in EMTALA. They did
enough to show they may have not followed protocol in a pregnant female who they
transferred. The protocol is to put a fetal monitor on all pregnant
females for 100 minutes. They could only show half that. They also failed
to document vital signs and did not follow proper pre-transfer protocol to see
lab tests prior to deciding on transfer. Since the court retained EMTLA jurisdiction
they also kept jurisdiction on the state based med mal complaints.
HIPAA
Patients v Geisinger Health Plan
To Be Filed
A processing error had erroneous
invoices mailed to about 2900 incorrect recipients. Again, no security in
place.
Archive
DISCLAIMER: Although this article is updated
periodically, it reflects the author's point of view at the time of publication.
Nothing in this article constitutes legal advice. Readers should consult with
their own legal counsel before acting on any of the information presented.